Site Changes
- Note 1: Major changes to the Privacy Act 1988 will come into effect in March 2014. Agencies, businesses and not for profits need to start preparing for these changes. For more information go to our privacy law reform page at www.oaic.gov.au
- Note 2: From 12 March 2013 content is no longer being added to, or amended, on this site, consequently some information may be out of date. For new privacy content visit the www.oaic.gov.au website.
Types
R v Company [2009] PrivCmrA 21
pdf (90.76 KB)
Case Citation:
R v Company [2009] PrivCmrA 21
Subject Heading:
Collection of and access to personal information, and use of preliminary inquiries power
Law:
National Privacy Principles 1.1 and 6.1 in Schedule 3, and section 42 of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Facts:
The complainant suspected that they were under surveillance by a company that had mistaken the complainant for one of its employees. The complainant had a relative who did work for the company and who had been on leave for some time. The complainant became suspicious after they were followed and after the company had called their employer asking if the relative worked there.
The complainant wrote to the company requesting access to any recordings or photographs of them. After four weeks had passed without a response, the complainant wrote to the Privacy Commissioner requesting that the company destroy any recordings or photographs of the complainant or, alternatively, provide the complainant with access to their personal information.
Issues:
NPP 1.1 states that an organisation must not collect personal information unless the information is necessary for its functions or activities.
NPP 6.1 provides that individuals may access personal information that organisations hold about them unless certain exceptions apply.
Section 42 of the Privacy Act allows the Commissioner to make inquiries of a respondent to determine:
- whether the Commissioner has power to investigate the matter to which the complaint relates; or
- whether the Commissioner may decide not to investigate the matter.
Outcome:
The Commissioner decided to make inquiries of the respondent under section 42 of the Privacy Act to ascertain whether the respondent had adequately dealt with the matter.
In response to the Commissioner's written inquiry, the company advised that it had not received the complainant's letter, but was willing to destroy all personal information about the complainant held by it and its solicitor. The company and its solicitor subsequently destroyed recordings and other personal information about the complainant and confirmed this in writing.
Consequently, the complainant told the Commissioner that they were satisfied with the company's actions and asked the Commissioner to close the complaint.
The Commissioner decided not to investigate the matter further under section 41(2)(a) of the Privacy Act on the grounds that the respondent had adequately dealt with the complaint.



Get RSS feeds