THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Federal Privacy Law > 2007 - Complaint Case Note 15 Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act Regulations
Spacer Gif Bullet Public Interest Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Complaint Case Notes & Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Audits
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet National Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Codes and Opt-in Registers
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Health
Spacer Gif Bullet Telecommunications
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Spent Convictions
Spacer Gif Bullet Data-matching
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Advisory Committee
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Review 2005
Spacer Gif Bullet ALRC Privacy Inquiry 2006 - 08
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Law History
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

2007 - Complaint Case Note 15

View printable version of this page

Case Citation: 

M v Health Service Provider [2007] PrivCmrA 15

Subject Heading:

Collection of sensitive information

Law:

National Privacy Principles 1 and 10 in Schedule 3 of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Facts:

The complainant went to a medical practitioner, who took a digital photograph of the complainant for the complainant's medical file.  The complainant viewed this as an unnecessary collection of their personal information.

The complainant raised the issue directly with the medical practitioner but the matter was not resolved. The complainant subsequently wrote to the Privacy Commissioner to complain about the collection of their personal information.

Issues:

National Privacy Principle 1.1 provides that an organisation must not collect personal information unless the information is necessary for one or more of its functions or activities.

National Privacy Principle 10.1 provides that an organisation must not collect sensitive information about an individual unless certain circumstances exist, such as where the individual has provided consent.

Outcome:

The Privacy Commissioner investigated under section 40(1) of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).

In considering National Privacy Principle 1.1 the medical practitioner conceded that it was not necessary to record a digital photograph of the complainant to provide a health service.  As such, the Commissioner took the view that the medical practitioner breached NPP 1.1 by unnecessarily collecting the complainant's digital photograph for inclusion in the patient database.

In the course of the investigation the medical practitioner and the complainant disagreed on whether consent had been given for the photograph to be taken, so it was difficult to determine whether National Privacy Principle 10.1(a) could be relied upon. 

As a result of the complaint the medical practitioner removed the complainant's digital photograph from the medical practice's records and has discontinued the practice of taking photographs for patient files.

Satisfied that the medical practitioner had adequately dealt with the complaint, the Commissioner closed the matter under section 41(2)(a) of the Privacy Act.

OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER

June 2007



Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter