THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Federal Privacy Law > 2008 - Complaint Case Note 14 Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act Regulations
Spacer Gif Bullet Public Interest Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Complaint Case Notes & Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Audits
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet National Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Codes and Opt-in Registers
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Health
Spacer Gif Bullet Telecommunications
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Spent Convictions
Spacer Gif Bullet Data-matching
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Advisory Committee
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Review 2005
Spacer Gif Bullet ALRC Privacy Inquiry 2006 - 08
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Law History
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

2008 - Complaint Case Note 14

View printable version of this page

Case Citation:

N v Telecommunications Company [2006] PrivCmrA 14

Subject Heading:

Listing of a serious credit infringement on an individual’s consumer credit information file

Law:

Section 6(1), section 18E(1)(b)(x), section 18E(8)(a) and section 18E(8)(b) of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Facts:

The complainant cancelled their telecommunication service with the telecommunications company. Subsequent to this cancellation, the complainant received notices that the account was overdue and seeking payment of the account. The complainant contacted the telecommunications company disputing the overdue account. The telecommunications company listed a serious credit infringement on the complainant’s consumer credit information file.

Issues:

Section 18E(8)(a) and section 18E(8)(b) of the Privacy Act restricts the information that can be disclosed by a credit provider to a credit reporting agency. A credit provider’s opinion that an individual has, in the specific circumstances, committed a serious credit infringement, is information permitted to form part of an individual’s consumer credit information file under section 18E(1)(b)(x) and this provision also interacts with the definition below.

Section 6(1) of the Privacy Act says that a serious credit infringement means an act done by a person:

  1. that involves fraudulently obtaining credit, or attempting fraudulently to obtain credit; or
  2. that involves fraudulently evading the person’s obligations in relation to credit, or attempting fraudulently to evade those obligations; or
  3. that a reasonable person would consider indicates an intention, on the part of the first-mentioned person, no longer to comply with the first-mentioned person’s obligations in relation to credit.

The issue for consideration was whether the telecommunications company was permitted to list a serious credit infringement on the complainant’s consumer credit information file in the circumstances.

Outcome:

The Privacy Commissioner opened an investigation into the matter under section 40(1) of the Privacy Act. The Commissioner wrote to the Telecommunications Company providing an opportunity to respond to the complainant’s allegations. In response the Telecommunications Company put forward a proposal to resolve the matter.

Without admission of liability, the Telecommunications Company proposed resolution included the removal of the enquiry and the serious credit infringement listing from the complainant’s consumer credit information file, and a refund of the amount to the complainant. The complainant accepted this offer in resolution of the complaint. The Privacy Commissioner closed the complaint under section 41(2)(a) of the Privacy Act on the grounds that the Telecommunications Company had adequately dealt with the complaint.

OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER

June 2008



Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter