THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Federal Privacy Law > 2004 - Complaint Case Note 12 Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act Regulations
Spacer Gif Bullet Public Interest Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Complaint Case Notes & Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Audits
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet National Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Codes and Opt-in Registers
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Health
Spacer Gif Bullet Telecommunications
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Spent Convictions
Spacer Gif Bullet Data-matching
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Advisory Committee
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Review 2005
Spacer Gif Bullet ALRC Privacy Inquiry 2006 - 08
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Law History
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

2004 - Complaint Case Note 12

View printable version of this page

Case Citation: P v Various Entities [2004] PrivCmrA 12

Subject Heading: Improper use of personal information / declined to investigate on the basis that the complaint was lacking in substance

Law: National Privacy Principle 2 - Use Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and section 41(1)(d) Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Facts: The complainant lodged a complaint about various medical treatments whilst undergoing medical care and the way the media and other professional bodies had been dealing with him.

Issues: National Privacy Principle (NPP) 2 sets out the general principle that an organisation must only use or disclose personal information for the primary purpose of collection. Use and disclosure for a secondary purpose is not allowed except where such use or disclosure falls within the exceptions listed in NPP 2.

On initial presentation of the complaint, the facts were unclear and the respondents were unknown, hence it was unclear which entities had improperly used the complainant's personal information. Further telephone follow up with the complainant failed to reveal privacy issues involving specified respondents. As there was no specific respondent, the Office could not open an investigation. However, the Office provided the complainant with information about the Victorian Privacy Commissioner's jurisdiction and that of the Office of the Health Services Commissioner, because these bodies appeared to be more relevant in the circumstances.

Outcome: Section 41(1)(d) of the Privacy Act provides the Commissioner with a discretion to decline to investigate a complaint where the complaint is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance. The complaint was found to be lacking in substance since it was unclear who had allegedly misused the complainant's personal information. Accordingly the complaint was closed under section 41(1)(d) of the Privacy Act on the basis that the circumstances described by the complainant were lacking in substance.

OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
June 2004



Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter